Level-II_Reflection_0905

Session started with two minutes game. This was the same game which we played earlier in a group (and assigned one minute everyone) to express thoughts. I felt exercise tough than played earlier. Might be because of the reason; I was presenting thoughts to a larger audience than earlier. My performance was very very poor which I haven’t expected so far. I could not express as many thoughts as I should be. On the contrary, I like performance of Nilam, Seema and Ankur. It was feeling like as a natural speech. Take out from this game is to learn formatting sentences. We should increase reading and activate schemata to have variety of thoughts. This sort of exercise becomes helpful to scan emails and hidden meaning behind.

Presentation on argument was a group exercise. Based on material provided for reading, I felt it tough. We tried our best to present in a cogent manner and in a different way than provided in a material. We have presented valid and invalid arguments. It was an interesting topic. I personally feel that presentation given by team of Nilam was excellent. Out of the three topics assigned, their topic was the toughest one. However they explained in an astonishing way. An example given by Pragnesh on Intelligent buffalo was confusing. Still I am confused as to whether buffalo can be intelligent? :). I learned to match premises with conclusion. Conclusion may not be true unless argument is valid.